You already know that under ERISA a court may, in its discretion, award reasonable attorney’s fees and costs to a claimant seeking benefits if there is a showing of “some degree of success on the merits.”

What does “some degree of success on the merits” mean?

You probably already know it does not require

How will a court construe ambiguities in ERISA plan terms?

If the plan confers discretion to the administrator “to interpret plan terms,” ambiguities may NOT be construed against the plan administrator.

Here’s the case of Porter v. Lowe’s Companies, __ F.3d__ (5th Cir. September 24, 2013) (PDF).

FACTS: Elizabeth Porter, employed with Lowe’s

Did you know that awarding at least some benefits, rather than denying benefits entirely, helps prove the claims administrator is “unbiased”?

Also, when there are sharp conflicting opinions between the claimant’s doctors and claims administrator reviewing doctors, the claims administrator may be entitled to greater deference….

Here’s the case of Cannon v.

What happens when an independent, unsolicited source provides evidence that a disability claimant may be committing fraud?  Can you consider emails hacked from a computer? What must the claim administrator do to evaluate the source of the evidence?

Here’s a fun new case to read (even if you don’t care about the issue presented). Truitt

An Insurance Commissioner’s non-binding opinion banning discretionary language in an ERISA governed plan has no effect.

Here’s the case of Frazier v. Life Insurance Company of North America, __ F.3d __ (6th Cir. August 5, 2013) (Court  is “‘not bound by language in a non-binding opinion [banning discretionary language in a disability

See how the Supreme Court’s June 26, 2013 United States v. Windsor decision, which concluded the Defense of Marriage Act unconstitutionally restricted spousal benefits to members of the opposite sex, affects ERISA beneficiary decisions.

Here’s the case of Cozen O’Connor PC v. Jennifer Tobits, 2013 WL 3878688 (E.D. Pa July 29, 2013)(“Following the