Does the claim administrator waive the timeliness defense if it failed to deny the claim on that basis during administrative review? YES!

Here is a nice case that summarizes the point, and the status of waiver in the circuits. Becknell v. Severance Pay Plan of Johnson and Johnson, 2014 WL 1577723 (D. N.J. April 21, 2014).

FACTS:  Plaintiff became disabled on April 16, 2008 and made a claim for short term and long term disability benefits under the self-funded ERISA plan.  On October 25, 2012 Plaintiff made a written claim for severance benefits under the ERISA plan.  The request was four years late.  The plan denied the severance benefit, but not because it was untimely.  Instead, the claim was denied because Plaintiff’s termination did not result from one of the severance events in the plan.

ISSUE:  Did the ERISA plan waive the timeliness defense because it was not asserted in the administrative process?

HELD:  YES.

  1. “Some circuits prevent a plan administrator from relying on a defense…that was not articulated in the administrative proceedings[.]” Op. at 6.  (The court cites cases from the 1st, 2nd 5th, 8th 9th, 10th circuits.)
  2. “Other circuits have acknowledged that waiver is possible in some factual circumstances.” (The court cites cases from the 4th, 7th, 11th circuits). Op. at 7.
  3. “Defendants wish to preclude Plaintiff from asserting his claim based on a timeliness defense that they failed to raise during the administrative proceedings. The fact remains that ‘[t]he time to deny Plaintiff’s claim on that basis of untimeliness has come and long gone.’”  Op. at 12.
Print:
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
Photo of Mike Reilly Mike Reilly

Mike Reilly is a nationally recognized labor, employment and employee benefits attorney, named one of the “Top 100 Most Powerful Employment Attorneys in the Nation” for the past five consecutive years by Human Resource Executive®. He has decades of experience providing strategic employment…

Mike Reilly is a nationally recognized labor, employment and employee benefits attorney, named one of the “Top 100 Most Powerful Employment Attorneys in the Nation” for the past five consecutive years by Human Resource Executive®. He has decades of experience providing strategic employment advice, and has represented clients in more than 75 jury trials, arbitrations, bench trials and claims before the EEOC and Washington State Human Rights Commission.

Small and large employers retain Mike for his strategic advice and decades of experience in employment issues and litigation, business decisions and litigation avoidance. Mike provides advice in claims involving discrimination, retaliation, wrongful discharge, disability accommodation, ERISA and non-ERISA employee benefit claims, and wage/hour claims. He served as lead counsel in an employee raiding/trade secret case as reported in the Wall Street Journal, and defends employers in class action claims.

Mike’s remarks on employment issues have been quoted in NewsweekCorporate Legal TimesSeattle TimesEmployee Relations Law JournalPuget Sound Business JournalCFO.com, and other professional journals and management publications. Chambers USA’s Guide to America’s Leading Lawyers for Businessrates Mike in the top ranking (band one) for his work in labor and employment law, and has described him as “one of Seattle’s top-rate attorneys” who is “truly phenomenal [with] superb legal instincts” and “an amazingly assertive litigator.” His clients include Nordstrom, Seattle Seahawks, Home Depot, KeyBank, Starbucks, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Red Robin and Seattle Chamber of Commerce, among others.