The claimant seeking long term disability benefits under your ERISA Plan was found to be disabled by the Social Security Administration.

Does that automatically mean the claimant is entitled to disability benefits under the ERISA Plan? No, but you must explain why you are taking a position different from the Social Security Administration.  Met Life v. Glen, 554 U.S. 105 (2008) highlighted that claims administrators must reconcile the Social Security determination with their ultimate ERISA plan denial. In other words, you cannot ignore the decision, but you are not bound by it.

A  great new blog post explains how disability findings by the Social Security Administration involve different evaluative criteria, and give lots of weight to a claimant’s subjective complaints.  Avik Roy, on The Apothecary Blog, http://www.forbes.com/sites/aroy/2013/04/08/how-americans-game-the-200-billion-a-year-disability-industrial-complex/  explains:

  1. Congress has dramatically expanded the definition of who gets called ‘disabled.’”
  2. Congress relaxed disability eligibility criteria, giving greater weight to an applicant’s own assessment of disability. In 1984, Congress unanimously passed the Social Security Disability Benefits Reform Act. The SSDBRA instructed the government to: (a) place greater weight on applicants’ own assessments of their disability, especially when it came to pain and discomfort; (b) replace the government’s medical assessments with those of the applicants’ own doctors; and (3) loosen the screening criteria for mental illness, among other things. “The overall effect was to create a giant loophole, by which an applicant’s subjective claim that he was in pain, or mentally incapacitated, would be enough to claim disability.”
  3. Statistics prove that while “Americans may be gaining weight, they suffer from fewer disabling conditions than they did 40 years ago, thanks to advances in medical technology.”  Yet a new investigation shows that compared to 50 years ago “diagnoses that lend themselves to subjective manipulation, like back pain and mental illness, have grown substantially.”
  4. The economic incentive to apply for Social Security Disability is greater than ever. According to published research, “the incentive to apply for [disability insurance] will increase with the rising value of health insurance through Medicare.”  The rising value of disability payments can “explain as much as 20 percent of the growth in [Social Security income] receipt.”

This can help reconcile why a finding of Social Security disability does not automatically render a claimant qualified to receive long term disability benefits under your ERISA plan.

Print:
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
Photo of Mike Reilly Mike Reilly

Mike Reilly is a nationally recognized labor, employment and employee benefits attorney, named one of the “Top 100 Most Powerful Employment Attorneys in the Nation” for the past five consecutive years by Human Resource Executive®. He has decades of experience providing strategic employment…

Mike Reilly is a nationally recognized labor, employment and employee benefits attorney, named one of the “Top 100 Most Powerful Employment Attorneys in the Nation” for the past five consecutive years by Human Resource Executive®. He has decades of experience providing strategic employment advice, and has represented clients in more than 75 jury trials, arbitrations, bench trials and claims before the EEOC and Washington State Human Rights Commission.

Small and large employers retain Mike for his strategic advice and decades of experience in employment issues and litigation, business decisions and litigation avoidance. Mike provides advice in claims involving discrimination, retaliation, wrongful discharge, disability accommodation, ERISA and non-ERISA employee benefit claims, and wage/hour claims. He served as lead counsel in an employee raiding/trade secret case as reported in the Wall Street Journal, and defends employers in class action claims.

Mike’s remarks on employment issues have been quoted in NewsweekCorporate Legal TimesSeattle TimesEmployee Relations Law JournalPuget Sound Business JournalCFO.com, and other professional journals and management publications. Chambers USA’s Guide to America’s Leading Lawyers for Businessrates Mike in the top ranking (band one) for his work in labor and employment law, and has described him as “one of Seattle’s top-rate attorneys” who is “truly phenomenal [with] superb legal instincts” and “an amazingly assertive litigator.” His clients include Nordstrom, Seattle Seahawks, Home Depot, KeyBank, Starbucks, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Red Robin and Seattle Chamber of Commerce, among others.